Oil prices rise as investors weigh renewed U.S.-Iran conflict risks

Oil prices rose on Friday as investors weighed the risk of renewed military escalation between the United States and Iran following the midterm elections, according to CNBC. The gains were tempered by reports that Iran had sent a nuclear proposal to Washington, which kept hopes of a diplomatic resolution alive.

Key points

• Brent crude futures climbed 1.67% to $99.90 a barrel, according to CNBC.
• U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures gained 1.43% to $91.69 a barrel.
• Bob McNally of Rapidan Energy Group said he sees an 80% probability of fighting resuming, and forecast that both benchmarks could climb above $100 a barrel.
• Iran reported three additional attacks on oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday.
• Reuters, citing a senior Iranian official, reported that Iran sent a nuclear proposal to Washington through Qatar.

What happened

Crude futures moved higher in Friday trading as market participants tried to judge whether the end of the U.S. midterm election campaign could open the door to renewed action against Iran. Any such action would put Middle Eastern oil supplies at risk, which is why traders have been watching the issue closely. The price moves were modest in percentage terms, but they reflected a market that remains sensitive to every new development in the region.

According to CNBC, Brent crude futures rose 1.67% to $99.90 a barrel. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures gained 1.43% to $91.69 a barrel. Both benchmarks were trading close to the $100 level that many market watchers view as a psychological threshold.

Bob McNally, founder and president of Rapidan Energy Group, told CNBC's 'Squawk Box Asia' that he sees an 80% probability of military fighting resuming. He forecast that both oil benchmarks could climb above $100 a barrel if that happens. McNally said the core disagreement in the negotiations has not been resolved.

He argued that U.S. President Donald Trump is determined, as a legacy item, to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, and to have Tehran give up its nuclear capabilities. He said the Iranian regime is not willing to do so, and that as long as that gap remains, the escalation dynamic stays in place.

CNBC reported that McNally's view is shared by other analysts, including Samy Chaar, chief economist at Lombard Odier, and Luca Bindelli, the bank's head of investment strategy.

The diplomatic track is the main counterweight. Reuters, citing a senior Iranian official, reported that Tehran had sent a nuclear proposal to Washington through Qatar. The report did not, according to the sources available, describe the terms of that proposal or any US response, so the scale of any breakthrough remains unclear.

Why it matters for traders

Oil is especially sensitive to Middle East risk because a large share of global crude shipments passes through the region's waterways. When investors fear that supply could be disrupted, they often bid up prices in anticipation of tighter availability. That premium can fade quickly if diplomatic signals improve, which is why the market has been swinging between the two scenarios.

The Strait of Hormuz is the focal point of the current concern. According to CNBC, Iran reported three additional attacks on oil tankers there on Thursday. Data from the UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO), cited by CNBC, indicated that attacks on vessels were continuing at a near-record rate. Even without a formal escalation, a sustained pattern of incidents can keep a risk premium in prices.

For energy markets, the key distinction is between a short-lived spike driven by headlines and a longer-term shift in supply expectations. Analysts quoted by CNBC suggest the current situation depends on whether the core disagreement over Iran's nuclear program can be bridged. Until that question is settled, traders are likely to react sharply to news from the region.

Market reaction and data

The table below summarises the oil benchmark moves reported by CNBC on Friday. These figures come from the CNBC report and are not drawn from a separate live feed.

Both benchmarks rose at a similar pace, which suggests the move was driven by a shared global risk premium rather than a factor specific to one grade. The gap between Brent and WTI at these levels is consistent with the usual relationship between the two contracts, though this article does not analyse that spread in detail.

Broader financial markets were not the focus of the CNBC report, and no cryptocurrency or equity data was included in the reporting used for this article.

What to watch next

• Whether Iran's nuclear proposal, sent through Qatar, leads to formal talks or is rejected by Washington.
• Further incident reports in the Strait of Hormuz and updates from the UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO).
• Any signs that military fighting could resume, which McNally has assigned an 80% probability.
• Whether Brent or WTI moves sustainably above the $100 level that McNally has flagged as possible.

Traders will also be looking for official statements from Washington and Tehran. Because the situation is developing quickly, headlines may move prices before the underlying facts are fully clear.

Follow every update in our Top 10 Breaking Market News, read Scottish Mortgage Sells Tesla Stake, Trims SpaceX Holding to 11.1% or see all of today's top market news.

FAQ

Why are oil prices rising right now?

According to CNBC, investors are weighing the risk of renewed U.S.-Iran military escalation after the midterm elections. Attacks on tankers in the Strait of Hormuz have added to the concern about supply.

What did analysts say about the outlook for oil prices?

Bob McNally of Rapidan Energy Group said he sees an 80% probability of fighting resuming and forecast that both benchmarks could climb above $100 a barrel. CNBC reported that other analysts, including Samy Chaar and Luca Bindelli of Lombard Odier, share his view.

Could a diplomatic deal lower oil prices?

Reuters, citing a senior Iranian official, reported that Iran sent a nuclear proposal to Washington through Qatar, which has raised hopes of a diplomatic resolution. The reporting does not state whether the proposal will be accepted, so the impact on prices remains uncertain.